Signed J. A. Dixon
The above letter was sent out again on April 22, 2005 to Superintendent Rubadeau.
Below is Superintendent Ron Rubadeau's reply to J.A. Dixon's letter.
No courteous thank you for your letter, we have reviewed it etc.
A very poor example for students..typical of Rubadeau... a hypocrite.
SD #23 did not provide Fisher with an adequate opportunity to clear his name.
Fisher had no notice that he was being given an opportunity to ‘clear his name’ let alone notice of a hearing ‘conducted specifically for the stated purpose of allowing him to attempt to refute the charges against him ‘before the officials’ considering those
School District 23 even where the employee has not requested a hearing, should provide one where the charges are of a serious nature in order to avoid potential liability, especially in those jurisdictions that do
not require employees to affirmatively request name-clearing hearings.
Courts have ruled that an employee who is discharged amidst stigmatizing
charges of professional incompetence is entitled to a name-clearing hearing.
Sent out again April 22, 2005
**********
Claims Are Groundless & Evidence Fabricated.
SD #23 Colluded & Conspired To Discredit Fisher
J.A.Dixon